18 Feb UPDATE: USPTO revises controversial new email requirement
USPTO faced criticism that its new rules would put users at risk, especially around privacy and a potential rise in scams targeting unsuspecting trade mark applicants.
After receiving backlash from users and input from US trade mark practitioners, the USPTO has revised portions of the most recent guide, just before the mandatory electronic filing requirements went live over the weekend.
Below is a summary of the main changes since the last update we provided you:
1. Applicants are not required to provide an email address for USPTO records.
The USPTO have changed this requirement, taking note of the widespread concern about increased unsolicited and fraudulent third party trade mark-related communications.
When filing on behalf of our clients (applicants) and providing details to USPTO, we can now use:
- an email address of the trade mark owner/applicant;
- our US associate’s (representative’s) email address; or
- an MBIP email address.
2. If the applicant’s residential address is different than their mailing address, then the residential address needs to be provided to the USPTO (it will be masked from the public records). In most cases, P.O. boxes and “care of” addresses will not be accepted.